A concise review on analytical profile of chlorthalidone

 

Yogesh A. Chaudhari1, Vikas R. Patil2*, Rakesh R. Gujar3, Kuldip R. Patil3, Sopan Nangare4*

1Department of Pharmaceutics, Smt. S. S. Patil College of Pharmacy, Chopda: 425107, Maharashtra, India.

2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy,

Paldhi (Bk): 425103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India.

3Department of Pharmaceutics, TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy,

Paldhi (Bk): 425103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India.

4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, H. R. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Shirpur: 425405, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: vikaspatil259@gmail.com, snangareopan@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Chlorthalidone (CHL) is an anti-hypertensive that reduces active sodium reabsorption and peripheral vascular resistance. Also, it is a diuretic commonly known as a thiazide diuretic. Due to the huge amount of use of CHL in different dosage forms for the management of hypertension, it needs qualitative and quantitative estimation in the pharmaceutical and biological formulation. Therefore, the main objective of this analysis of CHL in the pharmaceutical and biological formulation is in both qualitative and quantitative terms. In this review article, we have summarized UV/Vis Spectroscopy, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), etc. based methods for estimation of chlorthalidone. In addition to that, we have discussed the bioanalytical methods for CHL analysis. In conclusion, this review article will help to research scholars for further method development for drug estimation in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological fluids.

 

KEYWORDS: Chlorthalidone, Anti-hypertensive, Analytical methods, High-performance liquid chromatography, Bioanalytical methods.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Chlorthalidone (CHL) is a sulfamoylbenzamide diuretic that shows similar action to thiazide derivatives. It is regarded as a first-line medication for the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension Since meta-analyses showed that thiazide diuretics CHL minimize the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension. 1

 

CHL designated chemically as (RS)-2-Chloro-5-(1-hydroxy-3-oxo-2, 3-dihydro-1H-isoindol- 1-yl) benzene-1-sulfonamide. 2

 

Mechanism of action:

CHL exerts its therapeutic action by antagonizing sodium-chloride symporter in the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron. It inhibits the reabsorption of sodium at the level of the convoluted tubule and thus chloride through inhibition of the Na/Cl symporter. By removing sodium reabsorption at this location, the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron retains higher sodium content. This lack of reabsorption alters the osmotic gradient and shifts fluid distribution from the outside of the tubule to the inside of the tubule. The increased osmotic load from its increased sodium concentration leads to elevated intratubular volume, thus promoting its diuretic effect. 3

 

Pharmacokinetics:

Absorption:

In the gastrointestinal tract, CHL absorbs sporadically. It penetrates through the placental barrier and enters the breast milk. After oral dosing, bioavailability is approximately 65% with peak blood levels occurring after 8 to 12 hours.

 

Distribution:

CHL has a volume of distribution of 3.9 +- 0.81/kg, with around 75% bound to plasma protein and a blood-to-plasma ratio of 72.5% and it crosses the placenta.

 

Metabolism:

CHL is metabolized in the Liver.

 

Elimination:

Long-term administration has been found to result in 30 to 60% of the drug being excreted unaltered in the urine. It shows urinary excretion after 50 and 100 mg of medication. CHL clearance is 1.6 mL/min/Kg, and it decreases with age and with higher doses. 4

 

Pharmacodynamics:

The diuretic action of CHL commences a mean of 2-6 hours after dosing and continues for up to 72 hours. The diuretic effect of CHL is led to decrease extracellular fluid volume, plasma volume, cardiac output, total exchangeable sodium, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal plasma flow. CHL produces a dose-related reduction in serum potassium levels, elevations in serum uric acid and blood glucose and it can decrease sodium and chloride levels. 5

 

An analytical account of CHL:

For the determination of CHL in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations, an exhaustive literature search found numerous analytical techniques such as UV/Visible Spectrophotometry, HPLC, HPTLC, UPLC, and bioanalytical approaches. CHL is measured as a single constituent and in combination with amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, celiprolol HCl, candesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan, valsartan, benidipine, and metoprolol in various dosage forms.

 

Bio-analytical method for CHL:

Bio-analysis is a sub-discipline of analytical chemistry covering the quantitative measurement of xenobiotics (drugs and their metabolites, and biological molecules in unnatural locations or concentrations) and biotics (macromolecules, proteins, DNA, large molecule drugs, metabolites) in biological systems. 6 The summary of the reported bioanalytical methods is shown in Table 1.


 

Table 1: Bioanalytical determination of CHL

Sr. No

Drug

Sample matrix

Method

Column

Detection

Internal standard

Ref

1

CHL

Human plasma

RP-MLC

C8 reversed-phase

235 nm

Xipamide

7

2

ATN, CHL

Spiked human plasma

HPLC

Shim-pack cyanopropyl column

225 nm

HCT

8

3

CE, CHL

Biological fluids

HPLC

Hypurity C8 column

225 nm

LIS

9

4

ATN, CHL

Human breast milk

HPLC

Luna 5 µm CN column

225 nm

Guaifenesin

10

5

ATN, CHL

Human plasma

HPLC

ODS column

225 nm

Salbutamol and Xipamide

11

6

AZL, CHL

Human plasma

UFLC-MS/MS

Shimapack C-8 column

---

Valsartan

12

7

CHL

Human urine

RP-LC

HP-LiChrospher 100 RP 18

230 nm

Triamterene

13

8

CHL

Urine

HPLC

Hypenil ODs-C18(Pre-column)

LiChroCART ChiraDex (Analytical column)

230 nm

---

14

9

CHL

Blood

HPLC

RP column

214 nm

Sulfanilanide

15

10

CHL

Human Plasma, Urine

HPLC

LiChrosorb RP-18

226 nm

Probenecid

16

11

ATN, CHL

Human plasma

LC–MS–MS

RP C18 column

---

Metoprolol, HCT

17

12

AZL, CHL

Human plasma

LC-MS/MS

C18 RP column

---

HCT

18

13

CHL

Urine

HPLC

RP analytical column

214 nm

---

19

14

ATN, CHL

Human plasma

UPLC-MS

UPLC BEH C18

---

Atenolol-d7 and Chlorthalidone-d4

20

15

CAN, CHL

Human plasma

UPLC–MS/MS

UPLC BEH C18

---

---

21

 


UV-Visible spectroscopy method for CHL:

To date, lots of spectrophotometric methods have been accounted for the determination of CHL alone and in combination. This review compiles sixteen papers describing spectrophotometric methods for determination of alone CHL and fourteen papers for the same in combination. The details of Spectrophotometry determination of basic principle, sample matrix, lambda max, and solvent linearity range, and the correlation coefficient are summarized in Table 2.

 


Table 2: Spectrophotometric methods used for determination of CHL alone and in combined dosage form

Sr. No

Drug

Matrix

Solvent

Lambda Max (nm)

Linearity

(μg/mL)

Correlation

coefficient (R2)

Ref.

1

CHL

Bulk and tablet

Ethanol

Zero order        CHL: 275 nm,

First order         CHL: 275 nm

CHL:40-160

CHL: 0.998831

22

2

CHL

Bulk drug

0.2 M NaOH

CHL: 274.5

---

---

23

3

CIL, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

CIL: 271.83 nm and 278.34 nm

CHL: 233.83 nm and 250.0 nm

CIL: 2-10

CHL: 2.5-12.5

CIL: 0.999

CHL: 0.9986

24

4

CHL, LOS

Bulk and tablet

Methanol

CHL: 280-290.5 nm

LOS: 235-245 nm

CHL: 2-10

LOS: 4-20

CHL: 0.997

LOS: 0.999

25

5

CIL, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

CIL: 240 nm

CHL: 268 nm

CIL: 2-10

CHL: 2-10

CIL: 0.998

CHL: 0.995

26

6

OLM, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

OLM: 254 nm

CHL: 220 nm

OLM: 5-25

CHL: 5-25

OLM: 0.999

CHL: 0.999

27

7

OLM, CHL

Bulk and tablet

Methanol

OLM: 256 nm

CHL: 275 nm

OLM: 5-20

CHL: 5-20

OLM:0.997

CHL: 0.998

28

8

CHL, NVH

Marketed Formulation

Methanol

CHL: 226 nm

NVH: 282 nm

CHL: 5-25

NVH: 5-25

---

29

9

ATN, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

ATN: 318 nm

CHL: 290 nm

ATN: 10‑160

CHL: 5‑25

ATN: 0.995

CHL: 0.996

30

10

MET, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

MET: 275 nm

CHL: 284 nm

MET: 25-200

CHL: 25-200

MET: 0.9979

CHL: 0.9996

31

11

OLM, CHL

Tablet

Methanol

OLM; 260 nm

CHL; 215 nm

OLM:  4 -32

CHL: 2.5 -20

OLM: 0.9994

CHL: 0.9993

32

12

TEL,CHL

Bulk and tablet

Methanol

TEL: 296 nm

CHL: 275 nm

TEL: 4-28

CHL: 2.5- 17.5

TEL: 0.999

CHL: 0.9994

33

13

MET, CHL

Tablet

---

MET: 227.4 nm

CHL: 229.8 nm

MET: 5-30

CHL: 1.3-7.9

---

34

14

AZL, CHL

Bulk and pharmaceutical

Methanol

 

AZL: 286 nm

CHL: 257 nm

AZL: 8-50

CHL: 2-20

AZL: 0.9998

CHL: 0.9999

35

15

MET, CHL

Bulk

Methanol

MET: 267 nm

CHL: 243 nm

MET: 12-28

CHL: 3-7

MET: 0.9996

CHL: 0.9991

36

16

ATN, CHL

Bulk and tablet

Methanol

ATN: 225 nm

CHL: 284 nm

ATN: 10-60

CHL: 30-140

ATN: 0.999

CHL: 0.998

37

 


HPLC method for CHL:

The specificity of the HPLC method is excellent and simultaneously sufficient precision is also attainable. However, it has to be stated that the astonishing specificity, precision, and accuracy are attainable only if wide-ranging system suitability tests are carried before the HPLC analysis. For this reason, the expense to be paid for the high specificity, precision, and accuracy is also high 38. The summary of the reported HPLC methods is shown in Table 3.


 

Table 3: HPLC methods used for determination of CHL alone and in combined dosage form

Sr.

No

Drug name

Column

Mobile phase

Lambda max (nm)

Linearity

(μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Flow rate (mL/min)

Detector

Ref.

1.

CHL

RP C-18 column

50mM Disodium hydrogen phosphate: Methanol: Acetonitrile (70:30:05)

(pH 3.5 with OPA)

220 nm

0.1 to 3.2

10.82

1

UV

39

2.

CHL

Stainless steel tube

2-Propanol:Acetic acid: Water: n -Hexane (301.5:0.5:68 v/v)

254 nm

---

---

2

UV

40

3.

CHL

HiQ Sil C8

20 mM Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH 4.0): Methanol (30:70 %v/v)

230 nm

5-30

3.334±0.042

1

---

41

4.

CHL

Phenomenex Hyper Clone C 18 column

Methanol : Acetonitrile : Phosphate buffer (20mM) (pH 3.0 with OPA)

(30 : 10 : 60% v/v)

241 nm

2–12

---

1

UV

42

5.

CHL

Develosil ODS HG-5 RP C18

0.1% Orthophosphoric acid : Acetonitrile : Methanol

(12 : 18 : 70 v/v/v)

245 nm

0-70

7

1

UV

43

6.

CHL

Phenomenex Luna C18, 100A

Potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer: Methanol (55:45)  (pH-3.4)

244 nm

6-14

7

1

PDA

44

7.

CHL

Waters Associates Cl8 μ -Bondapak

Acetonitrile:2% Acetic acid

(30: 70)

280 nm

---

---

1.5

UV

45

8.

OLM, CHL

zorbax phenyl column

Buffer (pH 3.0,mobile phase A),

Acetonitrile (mobile phase B).

220 nm

10.0 to 60.0 μg/mL and 6.25 μg/mL

10.70 ±0.1 mins and 4.8 ± 0.1 mins

1.5

UV

46

9.

AMI, ATN, CHL

RP stainless steel C18 analytical column

Methanol and 0.05 M aqueous phosphate buffer

adjusted to pH 4

AMI 275 nm

and 225 nm for ATE and CHL

2–50,

25–150, and 2–100 μg/mL

4.07, 7.22, 13.21

1

PDA

47

10.

IBS,

LOS,

HTZ,

CHL

Hypersil BDS

0.05 M Sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile

220 nm

10–150 μg/mL

---

1

PDA

48

11.

HTZ,

CHL

LC-8-DB

1.0 mM Ammonium acetate and 2.0 mM octane sulfonic acid sodium salt in acetonitrile: water (25:75) solution. The pH was adjusted to 3.5 with GAA

254 nm

---

---

1.5

---

49

12.

AZL, CHL

ODS

0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid buffer: Acetonitrile (30:70)

230 nm

100 ppm-600ppm and 31.25ppm-187.5ppm

4.5 ±0.3 min

2.2 ±0.3 min

1

PDA

50

13.

IBS, CHL,CIL

C18 column

Buffer: Acetonitrile: TEA  (80:20:0.1 %v/v/v)

222 nm

30-90 μg/mL, 1.25-3.75 μg/mL and 1-3 μg/mL

3.807 min, 4.667 min, and 6.887 min

1

UV

51

14.

CIL, ATN, CHL

Hypersil- keystone C18

Methanol :Triple distilled water (80/20 v/v) having pH 7

225 nm

10-50 μg/mL for , 10-50 μg/mL  and 6- 36 μg/mL

3.25 ± 0.06,

5.36 ±0.08 and 9.02 ±0.08 min

1

UV

52

15.

CHL, AZL

Zorbax XBD-C8

Buffer (pH5.5) : Methanol (60:40)

234 nm

50.56 - 151.68 ppm and 80.010 -

240.030 ppm

6.030 and

10.997 min

1

UV

53

16.

OLM, CHL

Gemini C18

Water: Acetonitrile (55:45) with pH adjusted to 3 with OPA

250 nm

10-60 μg/mL and 5-30 μg/mL

2.95 and 3.91 min

1

 

UV

 

54

17.

AZL, CHL

BDS C18 column

Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10).

Phosphate buffer pH has been adjusted with orthophosphoric acid

260nm

10.0 to 60.0 μg/mL and 6.25 to 37.5 μg/mL

2.36±0.1 mins and 5.54±0.5 mins

0.9

PDA

55

18.

TEL, CIL,

CHL

BDS hypersil C18

Methanol: Buffer (0.05M ammonium acetate) pH 5 with orthophosphoric acid (40 : 60)

270nm

20–60 μg/mL, 5–15 μg/mL and 6.25–18.75 μg/mL

3.390 min, 11.477 min, and 4.167 min

1

 

UV

 

56

19.

MET,

TEL, CHL

Phenomenex C18 column

Phosphate buffer (pH adjusted to 3): Acetonitrile

310 nm

---

4.5, 7.2 and 11.01 min

1

UV

57

20.

OLM, CHL

BDS C18

10 mM Orthophosphoric acid buffer: Acetonitrile

(45:55v/v)

212 nm

20 - 120 μg/mL and 6.24- 31.25 μg/mL

3.216 and 2.113 min

1

PDA

58

21.

OLM, CHL

Inertsil ODS C18

KH2PO4 Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (60: 40 v/v)

275 nm

---

13.9 ± 0.1 min. and 4.4 ± 0.5 min

1

UV

59

22.

OLM, CHL

HypersilC18

Phosphate buffer (KH2PO4) adjusted to pH 5.0 with dilute orthophosphoric acid and methanol in the ratio of 40: 60 % v/v

240 nm

60 - 180 μg/mL and 18.75-56.25 μg/mL

2.240min and 3.042min

1.2

PDA

60

23.

BEN, CHL

Agilent C18 column

60% NaH2PO4 buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.0): Methanol (40%)

262 nm

4-12 μg/mL and 12.5-37.50 μg/mL

---

1

---

61

24.

CHL, CIL

C18 column

Phase A, (0.1% Formic acid in methanol: Acetonitrile (80: 20 v/v)

Phase B, (10 mM Ammonium acetate)

240 nm

---

6.047±0.2 min and 12.642 ±0.2 min

1

---

62

25.

CHL, IBS

Reverse phase column C18

0.02 M Ammonium phosphate buffer (pH 5.5): Acetonitrile:  Methanol (40:40:20 v/v/v)

220 nm

40-60% μg/mL, 480 - 720 % μg/mL

---

1

UV

63

26.

AZL, CHL

Double end-capped C18 column

10 mM Tris(hydroxymethyl)amino methane buffer (pH 7.7): Acetonitrile (60:40  v/v)

---

---

2.6, 4.9 min

1

---

64

27.

TEL, CHL

Agilent Extend C18

Disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH:6.5): Acetonitrile

235 nm

6-18 mcg/mL and 20-60 mcg/mL

3.82 min and 14.23 min

1

PDA

65

28.

EPM, CHL

Phenomenox,

Gemini C18

Water: Acetonitrile (55:45) with pH adjusted to 3.4 with ortho phosphoric acid

250 nm

10-400 μg/mL and 0.5-12.5

μg/mL

2.14 and 3.80 min

1

UV

66

29.

CHL, CIL

Inertsil ODS 3V

0.025 M Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer, pH  2.5 adjusted using dilute orthophosphoric acid (solvent A) and Acetonitrile (solvent B)

240 nm

200-600 μg/mL and 160-480 μg/mL

3.872 min and 7.668 min

1

PDA

67

30.

AZL, CHL

Eclipse XDB-C18

Methanol and potassium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 8, 0.05 M) (40:60,v/v)

210 nm

5.050.0 μg/mL and 2.5

25.0 μg/mL

---

0.8

UV

68

31.

ATN, AMI,

CHL

RP 18 column

Acetonitrile: 5mM Heptansulphonic acid sodium salt (20:80v/v, pH 4.4)

274 nm

40–160 μg/mL, 2-8 μg/mL and 10-40 μg/mL

4.2 ± 0.03, 5.1 ± 0.04,  6.5 ± 0.02 min

1

UV

69

32.

AZL,  CHL

Inertsil C8 column

0.025 M Phosphate buffer pH 2.7: Acetonitrile (52.5: 47.5%)

225 nm

2.5 – 40 and 1.5 – 25 μg/mL

0.11 and 0.29 min

1.5

PDA

70

33.

CHL, LOS

C18

Acetonitrile: Water (50: 50, v/v)

220 nm

10-30 μg/mL and 20-60 μg/mL

---

1

UV

71

34.

AMB, VAL, TEL, HTZ, CHL

Cosmosil PAQ

0.05 M Sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile

220 nm

2 –150

μg/mL

---

1

UV

72

35.

ENM, CHL

Hypersil BDS C18

Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (65:25:10 v/v/v)

210 nm

5-15 μg/mL and 12.5-37.5 μg/mL

7.749 and 4.247 min

1

UV

73

36.

TEL, CHL

CAPCELL C18

Potassium dihydrogen ortho-phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (35: 45: 20) (pH 3.5 adjusted with OPA)

 

---

20–100μg/mL and 6.25–31.25 μg/mL

3.640min. and 4.937min

0.8

---

74

37.

CHL, MPS

C18

Buffer pH 4.5: Methanol : Acetonitrile (50:25:25)

223 nm

5-15 μg/mL and 20-60 μg/mL

4.390 and 6.127 min

1

UV

75

38.

BEN, CHL

C18 Kromasil column

Methanol: 0.1M Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate buffer (40:60 v/v)

260 nm

2 - 6 μg/mL and 6.25 - 18.75 μg/mL

---

1

PDA

76

39.

AZL, CHL

C 18G column

Acetonitrile: 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid in water (40:60%v/v)

240 nm

5-80 μg/mL and 2.5-25 μg/mL

6.982 and 7.748 min

0.8

UV

77

40.

AZL, CHL

C18 column

Methanol: Water: Acetonitrile : 0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid (30:35:15:5 v/v/v/v)

251 nm

---

3.923min and 7.208 min

0.9

UV

78

41.

CIL, CHL

---

Methanol: Water (80: 20 v/v)

231.6 nm

10–70 μg/mL and 10–70 μg/mL

---

1

UV

79

42.

AZL, CHL

UPLC BEH

C18

0.02% Trifluoroacetic acid in water: Acetonitrile

225 nm

40 and 12.5 μg/mL

---

0.3

---

80

43.

BEN, TEL, CHL

C18

Buffer (pH 3.0): Methanol (50:50 v/v)

230 nm

2-6 μg/mL,

20-60 μg/mL and 6.25-18.75 μg/mL

6.690 min,

8.813 min and

4.887 min

1

PDA

81

44.

CHL, ATN

C18

0.1M KH2PO4: Methanol (65:35)

256nm

50 μg/mL to150 μg/mL and 50 μg/mL to150 μg/mL

3.346 and 3.931 min

1

PDA

82

45.

MPS, CHL

Inertsil ODS column

10mM Ammonium Acetate: Acetonitrile (70:30% v/v)

220nm

5-25 μg/mL and 2-6 μg/mL

5.6 and 7.5 min

1

PDA

83

46.

ATN and CHL

C18

Methanol:0.01 M Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (30:70 v/v pH 3.5)

214nm

10-1000 μg/mL and 0.05-20 μg/mL

---

---

UV

84

47.

CHL and CLH

Zorbax ODS

Column

1. 50% Methanol + 50% Water filtered through 1μm porosity membrane

2. 65% Methanol + 35% pH

7.9 Buffer solution (0.0022 M KH2P04 and 0.016 M Na2HPO4)

254 nm

---

---

---

---

85

48.

MPS and CHL

Inertsil ODS 3 column

Diammonium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 5.5): Methanol (70:30 v/v)

254 nm

50-300 μg/mL and 12.5-75 μg/mL

6.91 min and 9.94 min

1

---

86

 


HPTLC method for CHL:

Thin-layer chromatography is a popular technique for the analysis of a wide variety of organic and inorganic materials, because of its distinctive advantages such as minimal sample clean-up, a wide choice of mobile phases, flexibility in sample distinction, high sample loading capacity, and low cost. Four simple HPTLC methods have been studied for simultaneous estimation for CIL, TEL, AMI, and ATN. The summary of the reported HPTLC methods is shown in Table 4.

 

Ultra-Performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method for CHL

The summary of the reported all instrumental data of UPLC methods for the determination of CHL is summarized in Table 5.


 

Table 4: HPTLC methods for determination of CHL

Sr.

No

Name of drug

Formulation

Stationary phase plates

Mobile phase composition

Detection

(nm)

Linearity

Rf

Ref

NP

RP

NP

RP

NP

RP

NP

RP

1

CHL,

CIL

Bulk and tablet

Precoated silica gel F254

RP-18 Silica gel F254 S

Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Methanol (3.2:1.3:0.5 v/v/v)

Methanol: Water (3.2:1.8 v/v

275 nm

CHL:250-1500 ng/b,

CIL:200-1200 ng/b

 

CHL:250-1500 ng/b

CIL: 200-1200 ng/b

CHL:0.34 ± 0.02,

CIL: 0.79 ± 0.02

CHL:0.24 ± 0.02,

CIL: 0.81 ± 0.02

87

2

TEL,

CHL

Bulk and Tablet

Pre coated with silica gel 60F254

---

Toluene: 2-Propanol: 25% Ammonia (6.5:3.5:0.2 v/v/v)

---

257 nm

TEL:200 - 500 ng/spot and CHL-50-250 ng/spot

---

TEL:0.09,

CHL: 0.38

 

---

88

3

TEL,

CHL

Bulk and pharmaceutical dosage Form

Precoated silica gel 60F254

---

Acetonitrile: Toluene: Glacial acetic acid (7.5: 2.5: 0.05 v/v/v)

---

 

242 nm

---

---

TEL:0.26±0.02,

CHL: 0.67±0.02

---

89

4

AMI, ATN, CHL

Pharmaceutical dosage Form

Silica

gel 60F254

---

Chloroform–

Methanol–Ammonia 27%, w/w (9 + 2 + 0.3 v/v/v)

---

274 nm

AMI: 0.1–0.5,

ATN:

0.8–5.0,

CHL: 0.3–1.5 μg/b

---

---

---

90

NP: Normal phase; RP: Reverse phase

 

Table 5: Reported analytical UPLC method for determination of CHL

Sr.

No

Drug

Stationary phase

Mobile phase

Flow Rate

(mL/min)

Detection wavelength

Ref.

1.

CHL

KR100-5CHI-TBB column (150 mm × 4.6 mm,5μm)

n-Hexane: 2-Proponol: Acetic acid: Triethylamine (92:8:0.3:0.01 v/v)

1.2

260 nm

91

2.

LOS,

CHL

HSS C18 100 mm x 2.1x 1.8 μm column

560 mL of solution A (1.36 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer, pH 3.0) and 440 mL of solution B (Acetonitrile: Methanol 9:1)

0.4

230 nm

92

3.

CDC,

CHL

Dionex C18 column 50 × 2.1 mm, 2.2 µm particle size

5 mM, 6.2 ± 0.5 pH ammonium acetate buffer – acetonitrile

0.5

215 nm

93

4.

AZL, CHL

UPLC BEH C8 50 × 2.1mm i.d.

Phosphate buffer solution:- Acetonitrile (50 : 50)

0.31

254 nm

94

 


CONCLUSION:

The present review article provides comprehensive data of various analytical and bioanalytical methods developed for CHL alone and in combinations. For analysis purpose, different analytical methods have been reported that includes HPLC, HPTLC, UPLC, UV spectroscopy, etc. The method along with their details concerning the mobile phase, stationary phase, retention time, etc., have been summarized in tabular form that will be more helpful for the researchers for further analytical method development for estimation of CHL in dosage form and pure form. In the future, enlisted data can be used for the development of analytical methods bio-analysis of CHL in pharmaceutical and biological formulations. Finally, it presents an opportunity for greater information on what has already been done and what new methods and changes can be developed to get a better estimation of CHL.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

Authors are thankful to TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy, Paldhi (Bk) – 425 103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India for providing necessary library facilities.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare that no conflict of interest.

 

ABBREVIATIONS:

1. µg/mL - Micro Gram per Milliliter

2. HPLC - High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

3. HPTLC - High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography

4. LC-MS/MS - Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy-Mass Spectroscopy

5. UPLC – Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography

6. nm - Nano Meter

7. NP – Normal Phase

8. RP - Reverse Phase

9. UV/VIS - Ultra Violet/Visible Spectroscopy

10. PDA - Photo Diode Array

11. GAA – Glacial Acetic Acid

12. CHL - Chlorthalidone

13. ATN - Atenolol

14. CE - Celiprolol HCl

15. AZL - Azilsartan Medoxomil

16. CAN - Candesartan

17. CIL - Cilnidipine

18. LOS - Losartan Potassium

19. OLM - Olmesartan Medoxomil

20. NVH - Nebivolol Hydrochloride

21. MET - Metoprolol Tartrate

22. TEL - Telmisartan

23. AMI - Amiloride Hydrochloride

24. AML - Amlodipine

25. CDC - Candesartan Cilexetil

26. IBS - Irbesartan

27. HTZ - Hydrochlorothiazide

28. BEN - Benidipine

29. EPM - Eprosartan Mesylate

30. AMB - Amlodipine Besylate

31. VAL - Valsartan

32. ENM - Enalapril Maleate

33. MPS - Metoprolol Succinate

34. BEN - Benidipine Hydrochloride

35. CLH - Clonidine Hydrochloride

36. WHO - World Health Organization

 

REFERENCE:

1.      Gandhi SV, Sanklecha AP. HPLC method development and validation for estimation of chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Drug Delivary and Therapeutics. 2019; 9(4): 53-56.

2.      “Drug profile for Chlorthalidone”: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00310

3.      Kerndt C, Patel J. Chlorthalidone. 2020; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553174/.

4.      Prabanathan A. Research Work: Development and Validation of Analytical Methods for the Simultaneous Estimation of Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone. http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/id/eprint/2262.

5.      US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/.

6.      Spooner N. Dried blood spot sampling for quantitative bioanalysis, time for a revolution. Bioanalysis. 2010; 2: 1781.

7.      Dadgar D, Kelly MT. Determination of chlorthalidone in human plasma by reversed-phase micellar liquid chromatography. Analyst.1988; 113(8): 1223-1227.

8.      Elgawish MS, Mostafa SM, Elshanawane AA. Simple and rapid HPLC method for simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in spiked human plasma. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2011; 19 (1): 43–49.

9.      Belal F, El-Brashy AM, El-Enany N, Tolba MM. Simultaneous determination of celiprolol HCl and chlorthalidone in tablets and biological fluids using high-performance liquid chromatography. Acta Chromatographica. 2012; 24 (2): 185–206.

10.   El Gindy A, Sallam S, Abdel Salam RA. HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in human breast milk. Journal of Separation Science. 2008; 31 (4): 677-682.

11.   Giachetti C, Tenconi A, Canali S, Zanolo G. Simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography Application to pharmacokinetic studies in man. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1997; 698(1-2): 187-194.

12.   Nalawade V, Joshi S. Development and validation of LC-MS / MS method for simultaneous determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone from the human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2019; 11 (7): 2533–2537.

13.   Campíns-Falcó P, Herráez-Hernández R, Sevtllano-Cabeza A. Simple and sensitive reversed-phase liquid chromatographic assay for analysis of chlorthalidone in urine. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 1993; 16 (12): 2571-2581.

14.   Herraez-Hernandez R, Campins-Falco P, Sevillano-Cabeza A. Application of column switching in high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of chlorthalidone enantiomers in untreated urine. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 1996; 19(3): 403-414.

15.   Rosenberg MJ, Lam KK, Dorsey TE. Analysis of chlorthalidone in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1986; 375; 438–443.

16.   Guelen PJM, Baars AM, Vree TB, Nijkerk AJ, Vermeer JM. Rapid and sensitive determination of chlorthalidone in blood, plasma and urine of man using high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications.1980; 181 (3-4): 497–503.

17.   Khuroo A, Mishra S, Singh O, Saxena S, Monif T. Simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone by LC–MS–MS in human plasma. Chromatographia. 2008; 68(9): 721-729.

18.   Ramakrishna R, kumar Puttrevu S, Bhateria M, Bala V, Sharma VL, Bhatta RS. Simultaneous determination of azilsartan and chlorthalidone in rat and human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2015; 990: 185-197.

19.   Salado SC, Vera-Avila LE. On-line solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of chlorthalidone in urine. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1997; 690 (1-2): 195-202.

20.   Shah JV, Patel DP, Shah PA, Sanyal M, Shrivastav PS. Simultaneous quantification of atenolol and chlorthalidone in human plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry. Biomedical Chromatography, 2016; 30 (2): 208–216.

21.   Patel B, Jangid AG, Suhagia BN, Desai N. The simultaneous UPLC – MS / MS determination of emerging drug combination; candesartan and chlorthalidone in human plasma and its application. Biomedical Chromatography. 2017; 31 (9): e3946.

22.   Niraimathi V, Jerad SA, Kumar SI. UV Spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of chlorthalidone in bulk and oral dosage form. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 3 (9): 7160-7167.

23.   Ingle SU, Patil PA, Kulkarni V, Patil SV, Salunke PA, Wagh RS. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014; 3(9): 958-63.

24.   Patel SN, Hinge MA, Bhanushali VM. Development and validation of a UV spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 9 (1): 41-45.

25.   Bhanushali VM, Hinge MA, Patel SN. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of Chlorthalidone and Losartan potassium. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2015; 9: 54-59.

26.   Kalyankar GG, Patel J, Bodiwala KB, Lodha SR, Mistry V. Development and validation of first order UV derivative spectroscopy method for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone in their combined tablet dosage form. An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 10(2): 101-111.

27.   Sheth A, Shah N. Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in their combined dosage forms. Pharma Science Monitor. 2016; 7 (3).

28.   Sawale V, Dhabarde DM, Mahapatra DK. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in bulk and tablet. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2017; 12(1): 55-66.

29.   AH S, Patel CN, Shah NJ. Article Details UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Chlorthalidone and Nebivolol hydrochloride in their combined dosage forms. Indian Drug. 2016; 53(11): 38-45.

30.   Pimple HC, Rane SS, Patil HD, Chaudhari RY, Patil VR. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of atenolol and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Pharmaceutical and BioSciences. Jan-Mar, 2017; 5 (1): 6-9.

31.   Raval HV, Patel DM, Patel CN. Estimation of metoprolol tartrate and chlorthalidone in combined dosage form by UV-spectrophotometric methods. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2011; 4(7): 1132-1134.

32.   Barot D, Pradhan PK, Patel G, Shah S, Parmar HP, Dey S, Upadhyay UM. Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric estimation of olmesartane medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. The Pharma Innovation, 2014; 3 (10, Part B): 76.

33.   Chaudhary BR, Dave JB. Spectrophotometric method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in dosage form by second derivative method. Pharma Science Monitor. 2019; 10(3).

34.   Padmane SP, Jain ND, Ittadwar AM, Walde SP. A Derivative UV spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in combined dose tablet formulation. International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014; 4 (1): 33-41.

35.   Ebeid WM, Elkady EF, El-Zaher AA, El-Bagary RI, Patonay G. Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric studies on azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone to be utilized in their determination in pharmaceuticals. An Analytical Chemistry Insights. 2014; 9: 33-40.

36.   Patel S, Patel D. Simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone by UV spectrophotometric method. Pharmagene. 2013; 1(3): 39-43.

37.   Akiful HM, Nivedita G, Prashanth KK, Pradeep K T, Hasan AS, Prakash VD. Simultaneous estimation of atenolol and chlorthalidone as bulk and in tablet dosage form using UV-spectrophotometry. Journal of pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2012; 1(4): 20-23.

38.   Siddiqui MR, AlOthman ZA, Rahman N. Analytical techniques in pharmaceutical analysis: A review. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2017; 10: S1409-S1421.

39.   Singh B, Patel DK, Ghosh SK. A reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical formulation. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2009; 1(2): 24-9.

40.   O'Hare MJ, Tan E, Moody JE. Quantitative determination of chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1979; 68 (1): 106-108.

41.   Gandhi SV, Sanklecha AP. HPLC method development and validation for estimation of chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 2019; 9 (4): 53-56.

42.   Sonawane S, Jadhav S, Rahade P, Chhajed S, Kshirsagar S. Development and validation of stability-indicating method for estimation of chlorthalidone in bulk and tablets with the use of experimental design in forced degradation experiments. Scientifica. Volume 2016, Article ID 4286482, 9 pages.

43.   Muthyala NI, Naresh B. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation for the quantitative estimation chlorthalidone in API and tablet dosage form. International journal of advanced research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 4(10): 32-41.

44.   Akshitha MFA. Method validation and development of chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC. International Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Science. Dec.2012; Volume 4, Issue 12: 9-16.

45.   Bauer J, Quick J, Krogh S, Shada D. Stability indicating assay for chlorthalidone formulation: Evaluation of the USP analysis and a high performance liquid chromatographic analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1983; 72 (8): 924-928.

46.   Manikandan S, Thirunarayanan G. Development and validation of reversed phase gradient HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in dosage forms. World Scientific News. 2015; (9): 132-154.

47.   Youssef RM, Maher HM, El-Kimary EI, Hassan EM, Barary MH. Validated stability-indicating methods for the simultaneous determination of amiloride hydrochloride, atenolol, and chlorthalidone using HPTLC and HPLC with photodiode array detector. Journal of AOAC International. 2013; 96 (2): 313-323.

48.   Mhaske RA, Sahasrabudhe S, Mhaske AA. RP-HPLC method for simultataneous determination of irbesartan, losartan, hydrohlorothiazide and chlorthalidone-application to commercially available drug products. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2012; 3 (4): 1116.

49.   Sa'Sa' SI, Jalal IM, Khalil HS. Determination of atenolol combinations with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone in tablet formulations by reverse-phase HPLC. Journal of Liquid Chromatography. 1988; 11 (8): 1673-1696.

50.   Sravani P, Rubesh Kumar S, Duganath N, Devanna N. Method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan and chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 4(5): 725, 729.

51.   Dagariya RK, Jat RK. Method development and validation of Irbesartan chlorthalidone and Cilnidipine in their combined tablet dosage form by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2017; 7 (4): 88-96.

52.   Solanki VS, Bishnoi RS, Baghel R, Jain D. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine, atenolol and chlorthalidone. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2018; 8 (6-s): 78-82.

53.   Dighe NS, Thorat SK, Shinde GS, Dhamak KV. Quantitative estimation and validation of chlorthlidone and azilsartan medoximil in bulk and tablet dosage form by using RP-HPLC. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2019; 9 (4-s): 264-268.

54.   Sawale V, Dangre P, Dhabarde D. I. S. H. A. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simulteneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 7(5): 266-269.

55.   Naazneen S, Sridevi A. Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in solid dosage forms. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 6(6): 236-43.

56.   Sharma A, Mishra A, Sharma S. Stability indicating simultaneous validation of telmisartan, cilnidipine and chlorthalidone with forced degradation behavior study by RP-HPLC in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 7: 6-12.

57.   Shahana VP, Ramya GM, Rajesh A, Kathirvel S. A comprehensive validation method and development of RP-HPLC for simultaneous estimation of metoprolol, telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and its formulation. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2018; 11(6): 827-834.

58.   Sreelatha P, Reddy DV, Palavai SR, Devi BR. Novel and validated stability-indicating HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of olmisartan and chlorthalidone in oral solid form. American Journal of Pharmatech Research. 2016; 6(3): 333-344.

59.   Sherje A, Sonalkar A. Article Details Forced Degradation Studies of Olmesartan medoxomil and Chlorthalidone: Development and Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC method. Indian Drugs. 2019; 56(3): 39-45.

60.   Yunoos M, Sankar DG. Optimization and validation of RP-HPLC stability indicating method for simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in pure drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 7(3): 2440-2448.

61.   Devaka N. V. S. K, Rao VM. Determination of benidipine and chlorthalidone content in tablets using stability-indicating reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography technique. Drug Invention Today. 2020; 13(2).

62.   Sawaikar L, Kapupara P. Development and Validation of a Stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in combined pharmaceutical dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(5): 2376-2380.

63.   Kalaiselvi P, Lalitha KG. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and irbesarton in pharmaceutical dosage form. Pharmacophore. 2014; 5 (2): 279-286.

64.   Kayesh R, Jahan MS, Sultan MZ. Development using response surface methodology and validation of a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in solid dosage form. Chromatographia. 2017; 80 (4): 593-603.

65.   Chaudhary BR, Dave JB. Development and validation of stability indicating gradient RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk API and fixed dose combination. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2017; 6(10): 1015-1029.

66.   Dangre P, Sawale V, Meshram S, Gunde M. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of eprosartan mesylate and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2015; 8 (2): 163-168.

67.   Kudumula N, Prasad YR. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in bulk and combined tablet dosage form. Pharmacophore. 2014; 5 (4): 442-450.

68.   Ebeid WM, Elkady EF, El-Zaher AA, El-Bagary RI, Patonay G. Stability-indicating RP-LC method for determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms: application to degradation kinetics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014; 406 (26): 6701-6712.

69.   El-Gindy A, Emara S, Mostafa A. HPLC and chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of atenolol, amiloride hydrochloride and chlorthalidone. Il Farmaco. 2005; 60 (3): 269-278.

70.   Gad MA, Amer SM, Zaazaa HE, Hassan SA. Strategies for stabilizing formulation and QbD assisted development of robust stability indicating method of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2020; 178: 112910.

71.   Hinge MA, Bhanusali VM, Mahida RJ. Spectrophotometric and high performance liquid chromatographic determination of chlorthalidone and losartan potassium in combined dosage form. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2016; 6 (4): 408-420.

72.   Mhaske RA, Garole DJ, Mhaske AA, Sahasrabudhe S. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of amlodipine besylate, valsartan, telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone: application to commercially available drug products. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2012; 3 (1): 141.

73.   Dave VM, Maheshwari DG. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of enalapril maleate and chlorthalidone in synthetic mixture. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2015; 6 (4): 666-673.

74.   Vanaja N, Preethi C, Manjunath SY, Pal K. Method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2015; 5 (4): 171-177.

75.   Kashyap R. K. R, Srinivasa U. S. U. Development and validation of HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and metoprolol succinate in bulk and dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Analysis. 2013; 1(2): 1-14.

76.   Jagadeesh K, Annapurna N. Stability indicating method to analyze benidipine and chlorthalidone using HPLC technique: Establishment, validation and application to tablets. Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020; 26(1): 75-81.

77.   Kumar TH, Begum A, Sankar DG. Determination of azilsartan medoximil and chlorthalidone in tablets exposed to forced degradation by using RP-HPLC. Biomedical Research. 2019; 30 (5). 10.35841/biomedicalresearch.30-19-331.

78.   Kasimala MB, Kasimala BB. Reverse phase-HPLC method development and validation for the Simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and Chlortalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Atoms and Molecules. 2012; 2(1): 117.

79.   Pawar VT, Pawar SV, More HN, Kulkarni AS, Gaikwad DT. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10 (11): 3990-3996.

80.   Samanthula G, Swain D, Sahu G, Bhagat S, Bharatam PV. Ultra HPLC method for fixed dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: identification and in silico toxicity prediction of degradation products. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2018; 73 (6): 560-569.

81.   Patel B, Chaudhary A, Gami S. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of benidipine hydrochloride, telmisartan and chlorthalidone in Tablet. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3: 110-124.

82.   Nagaraju K. Analytical method development and validation for the estimation of chlorthalidone and atenolol by RP-HPLC. International Journal for Advance Research and Development. 2018; 3(10): 133-138.

83.   Jyothi AN, Ali SS, Nalluri BN, Unnisa A. Novel RP-HPLC-PDA method for the simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 2014; 3(12): 941-950.

84.   Kang HA, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yoon H, Cho HY, Oh SY, Lee YB. Validated HPLC method for the pharmacokinetic study of atenolol and chlorthalidone combination therapy in korean subjects. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2006; 36(5): 331-338.

85.   Walters SM, Stonys DB. Determination of chlorthalidone and clonidine hydrochloride in tablets by HPLC. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 1983; 21 (1): 43-45.

86.   Sheth A, Patel CN, Ramlingam B, Shah N. Simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical solid dosage form by using a developed and validated reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic technique. Scholars Research Journal. 2012; 2(1):17.

87.   Rathod RH, Patil AS, Shirkhedkar AA. Novel NP and RP-HPTLC in praxis for simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2018; 8 (6): 862-871.

88.   Joglekar AP. Method development and validation for the estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form by HPTLC Method. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8 (4): 376-381.

89.   Parmar KE, Mehta RS, Patel ND, Parmar KE. Development and validation of HPTLC method for simultaneous determination of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 5 (2): 420-425.

90.   Youssef RM, Maher HM, El-Kimary EI, Hassan EM, Barary MH. Validated stability-indicating methods for the simultaneous determination of amiloride hydrochloride, atenolol, and chlorthalidone using HPTLC and HPLC with photodiode array detector. Journal of AOAC International. 2013; 96 (2): 313-323.

91.   Tadiboyina S, Bannimath G, Inturi BK. Enantiomeric separation and quantitative estimation of chlorthalidone enantiomers by chiral ultra-fast liquid chromatography. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry. 2015; 5: 361-367.

92.   Sirisha T, Gurupadayya B, Siddiraju S. Optimized and Validated RP-UPLC Method for the Determination of Losartan Potassium and Chlorthalidone in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2015; 5 (1): 133-136.

93.   Singhal M, Amin S, Kukrety A, Chauhan A, Tiwari VK, Singh RM, Singh GN. Development and validation of RP-UPLC method using experimental design approach for simultaneous. Indian Drugs. 2014; 51(11): 33-46.

94.   Hussein LA, Magdy NN, Ibrahim MA. Stability-indicating RP-UPLC method for simultaneous determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablets in the presence of its degradation products. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2019; 57(3): 213-219.

 

 

Received on 09.07.2021         Modified on 22.11.2021

Accepted on 28.12.2021   ©AandV Publications All Right Reserved

Res.  J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2022; 14(1):63-71.

DOI: 10.52711/0975-4377.2022.00011