A concise review on analytical profile of chlorthalidone
Yogesh A. Chaudhari1, Vikas R. Patil2*, Rakesh R. Gujar3, Kuldip R. Patil3, Sopan Nangare4*
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Smt. S. S. Patil College of Pharmacy, Chopda: 425107, Maharashtra, India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy,
Paldhi (Bk): 425103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India.
3Department of Pharmaceutics, TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy,
Paldhi (Bk): 425103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India.
4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, H. R. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Shirpur: 425405, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: vikaspatil259@gmail.com, snangareopan@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Chlorthalidone (CHL) is an anti-hypertensive that reduces active sodium reabsorption and peripheral vascular resistance. Also, it is a diuretic commonly known as a thiazide diuretic. Due to the huge amount of use of CHL in different dosage forms for the management of hypertension, it needs qualitative and quantitative estimation in the pharmaceutical and biological formulation. Therefore, the main objective of this analysis of CHL in the pharmaceutical and biological formulation is in both qualitative and quantitative terms. In this review article, we have summarized UV/Vis Spectroscopy, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), etc. based methods for estimation of chlorthalidone. In addition to that, we have discussed the bioanalytical methods for CHL analysis. In conclusion, this review article will help to research scholars for further method development for drug estimation in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological fluids.
KEYWORDS: Chlorthalidone, Anti-hypertensive, Analytical methods, High-performance liquid chromatography, Bioanalytical methods.
INTRODUCTION:
Chlorthalidone (CHL) is a sulfamoylbenzamide diuretic that shows similar action to thiazide derivatives. It is regarded as a first-line medication for the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension Since meta-analyses showed that thiazide diuretics CHL minimize the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension. 1
CHL designated chemically as (RS)-2-Chloro-5-(1-hydroxy-3-oxo-2, 3-dihydro-1H-isoindol- 1-yl) benzene-1-sulfonamide. 2
Mechanism of action:
CHL exerts its therapeutic action by antagonizing sodium-chloride symporter in the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron. It inhibits the reabsorption of sodium at the level of the convoluted tubule and thus chloride through inhibition of the Na/Cl symporter. By removing sodium reabsorption at this location, the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron retains higher sodium content. This lack of reabsorption alters the osmotic gradient and shifts fluid distribution from the outside of the tubule to the inside of the tubule. The increased osmotic load from its increased sodium concentration leads to elevated intratubular volume, thus promoting its diuretic effect. 3
Pharmacokinetics:
Absorption:
In the gastrointestinal tract, CHL absorbs sporadically. It penetrates through the placental barrier and enters the breast milk. After oral dosing, bioavailability is approximately 65% with peak blood levels occurring after 8 to 12 hours.
Distribution:
CHL has a volume of distribution of 3.9 +- 0.81/kg, with around 75% bound to plasma protein and a blood-to-plasma ratio of 72.5% and it crosses the placenta.
Metabolism:
CHL is metabolized in the Liver.
Elimination:
Long-term administration has been found to result in 30 to 60% of the drug being excreted unaltered in the urine. It shows urinary excretion after 50 and 100 mg of medication. CHL clearance is 1.6 mL/min/Kg, and it decreases with age and with higher doses. 4
Pharmacodynamics:
The diuretic action of CHL commences a mean of 2-6 hours after dosing and continues for up to 72 hours. The diuretic effect of CHL is led to decrease extracellular fluid volume, plasma volume, cardiac output, total exchangeable sodium, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal plasma flow. CHL produces a dose-related reduction in serum potassium levels, elevations in serum uric acid and blood glucose and it can decrease sodium and chloride levels. 5
An analytical account of CHL:
For the determination of CHL in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations, an exhaustive literature search found numerous analytical techniques such as UV/Visible Spectrophotometry, HPLC, HPTLC, UPLC, and bioanalytical approaches. CHL is measured as a single constituent and in combination with amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, celiprolol HCl, candesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan, valsartan, benidipine, and metoprolol in various dosage forms.
Bio-analytical method for CHL:
Bio-analysis is a sub-discipline of analytical chemistry covering the quantitative measurement of xenobiotics (drugs and their metabolites, and biological molecules in unnatural locations or concentrations) and biotics (macromolecules, proteins, DNA, large molecule drugs, metabolites) in biological systems. 6 The summary of the reported bioanalytical methods is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Bioanalytical determination of CHL
Sr. No |
Drug |
Sample matrix |
Method |
Column |
Detection |
Internal standard |
Ref |
1 |
CHL |
Human plasma |
RP-MLC |
C8 reversed-phase |
235 nm |
Xipamide |
7 |
2 |
ATN, CHL |
Spiked human plasma |
HPLC |
Shim-pack cyanopropyl column |
225 nm |
HCT |
8 |
3 |
CE, CHL |
Biological fluids |
HPLC |
Hypurity C8 column |
225 nm |
LIS |
9 |
4 |
ATN, CHL |
Human breast milk |
HPLC |
Luna 5 µm CN column |
225 nm |
Guaifenesin |
10 |
5 |
ATN, CHL |
Human plasma |
HPLC |
ODS column |
225 nm |
Salbutamol and Xipamide |
11 |
6 |
AZL, CHL |
Human plasma |
UFLC-MS/MS |
Shimapack C-8 column |
--- |
Valsartan |
12 |
7 |
CHL |
Human urine |
RP-LC |
HP-LiChrospher 100 RP 18 |
230 nm |
Triamterene |
13 |
8 |
CHL |
Urine |
HPLC |
Hypenil ODs-C18(Pre-column) LiChroCART ChiraDex (Analytical column) |
230 nm |
--- |
14 |
9 |
CHL |
Blood |
HPLC |
RP column |
214 nm |
Sulfanilanide |
15 |
10 |
CHL |
Human Plasma, Urine |
HPLC |
LiChrosorb RP-18 |
226 nm |
Probenecid |
16 |
11 |
ATN, CHL |
Human plasma |
LC–MS–MS |
RP C18 column |
--- |
Metoprolol, HCT |
17 |
12 |
AZL, CHL |
Human plasma |
LC-MS/MS |
C18 RP column |
--- |
HCT |
18 |
13 |
CHL |
Urine |
HPLC |
RP analytical column |
214 nm |
--- |
19 |
14 |
ATN, CHL |
Human plasma |
UPLC-MS |
UPLC BEH C18 |
--- |
Atenolol-d7 and Chlorthalidone-d4 |
20 |
15 |
CAN, CHL |
Human plasma |
UPLC–MS/MS |
UPLC BEH C18 |
--- |
--- |
21 |
UV-Visible spectroscopy method for CHL:
To date, lots of spectrophotometric methods have been accounted for the determination of CHL alone and in combination. This review compiles sixteen papers describing spectrophotometric methods for determination of alone CHL and fourteen papers for the same in combination. The details of Spectrophotometry determination of basic principle, sample matrix, lambda max, and solvent linearity range, and the correlation coefficient are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Spectrophotometric methods used for determination of CHL alone and in combined dosage form
Sr. No |
Drug |
Matrix |
Solvent |
Lambda Max (nm) |
Linearity (μg/mL) |
Correlation coefficient (R2) |
Ref. |
1 |
CHL |
Bulk and tablet |
Ethanol |
Zero order CHL: 275 nm, First order CHL: 275 nm |
CHL:40-160 |
CHL: 0.998831 |
22 |
2 |
CHL |
Bulk drug |
0.2 M NaOH |
CHL: 274.5 |
--- |
--- |
23 |
3 |
CIL, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
CIL: 271.83 nm and 278.34 nm CHL: 233.83 nm and 250.0 nm |
CIL: 2-10 CHL: 2.5-12.5 |
CIL: 0.999 CHL: 0.9986 |
24 |
4 |
CHL, LOS |
Bulk and tablet |
Methanol |
CHL: 280-290.5 nm LOS: 235-245 nm |
CHL: 2-10 LOS: 4-20 |
CHL: 0.997 LOS: 0.999 |
25 |
5 |
CIL, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
CIL: 240 nm CHL: 268 nm |
CIL: 2-10 CHL: 2-10 |
CIL: 0.998 CHL: 0.995 |
26 |
6 |
OLM, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
OLM: 254 nm CHL: 220 nm |
OLM: 5-25 CHL: 5-25 |
OLM: 0.999 CHL: 0.999 |
27 |
7 |
OLM, CHL |
Bulk and tablet |
Methanol |
OLM: 256 nm CHL: 275 nm |
OLM: 5-20 CHL: 5-20 |
OLM:0.997 CHL: 0.998 |
28 |
8 |
CHL, NVH |
Marketed Formulation |
Methanol |
CHL: 226 nm NVH: 282 nm |
CHL: 5-25 NVH: 5-25 |
--- |
29 |
9 |
ATN, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
ATN: 318 nm CHL: 290 nm |
ATN: 10‑160 CHL: 5‑25 |
ATN: 0.995 CHL: 0.996 |
30 |
10 |
MET, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
MET: 275 nm CHL: 284 nm |
MET: 25-200 CHL: 25-200 |
MET: 0.9979 CHL: 0.9996 |
31 |
11 |
OLM, CHL |
Tablet |
Methanol |
OLM; 260 nm CHL; 215 nm |
OLM: 4 -32 CHL: 2.5 -20 |
OLM: 0.9994 CHL: 0.9993 |
32 |
12 |
TEL,CHL |
Bulk and tablet |
Methanol |
TEL: 296 nm CHL: 275 nm |
TEL: 4-28 CHL: 2.5- 17.5 |
TEL: 0.999 CHL: 0.9994 |
33 |
13 |
MET, CHL |
Tablet |
--- |
MET: 227.4 nm CHL: 229.8 nm |
MET: 5-30 CHL: 1.3-7.9 |
--- |
34 |
14 |
AZL, CHL |
Bulk and pharmaceutical |
Methanol
|
AZL: 286 nm CHL: 257 nm |
AZL: 8-50 CHL: 2-20 |
AZL: 0.9998 CHL: 0.9999 |
35 |
15 |
MET, CHL |
Bulk |
Methanol |
MET: 267 nm CHL: 243 nm |
MET: 12-28 CHL: 3-7 |
MET: 0.9996 CHL: 0.9991 |
36 |
16 |
ATN, CHL |
Bulk and tablet |
Methanol |
ATN: 225 nm CHL: 284 nm |
ATN: 10-60 CHL: 30-140 |
ATN: 0.999 CHL: 0.998 |
37 |
HPLC method for CHL:
The specificity of the HPLC method is excellent and simultaneously sufficient precision is also attainable. However, it has to be stated that the astonishing specificity, precision, and accuracy are attainable only if wide-ranging system suitability tests are carried before the HPLC analysis. For this reason, the expense to be paid for the high specificity, precision, and accuracy is also high 38. The summary of the reported HPLC methods is shown in Table 3.
Table 3: HPLC methods used for determination of CHL alone and in combined dosage form
Sr. No |
Drug name |
Column |
Mobile phase |
Lambda max (nm) |
Linearity (μg/mL) |
Retention time (min) |
Flow rate (mL/min) |
Detector |
Ref. |
1. |
CHL |
RP C-18 column |
50mM Disodium hydrogen phosphate: Methanol: Acetonitrile (70:30:05) (pH 3.5 with OPA) |
220 nm |
0.1 to 3.2 |
10.82 |
1 |
UV |
39 |
2. |
CHL |
Stainless steel tube |
2-Propanol:Acetic acid: Water: n -Hexane (301.5:0.5:68 v/v) |
254 nm |
--- |
--- |
2 |
UV |
40 |
3. |
CHL |
HiQ Sil C8 |
20 mM Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH 4.0): Methanol (30:70 %v/v) |
230 nm |
5-30 |
3.334±0.042 |
1 |
--- |
41 |
4. |
CHL |
Phenomenex Hyper Clone C 18 column |
Methanol : Acetonitrile : Phosphate buffer (20mM) (pH 3.0 with OPA) (30 : 10 : 60% v/v) |
241 nm |
2–12 |
--- |
1 |
UV |
42 |
5. |
CHL |
Develosil ODS HG-5 RP C18 |
0.1% Orthophosphoric acid : Acetonitrile : Methanol (12 : 18 : 70 v/v/v) |
245 nm |
0-70 |
7 |
1 |
UV |
43 |
6. |
CHL |
Phenomenex Luna C18, 100A |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer: Methanol (55:45) (pH-3.4) |
244 nm |
6-14 |
7 |
1 |
PDA |
44 |
7. |
CHL |
Waters Associates Cl8 μ -Bondapak |
Acetonitrile:2% Acetic acid (30: 70) |
280 nm |
--- |
--- |
1.5 |
UV |
45 |
8. |
OLM, CHL |
zorbax phenyl column |
Buffer (pH 3.0,mobile phase A), Acetonitrile (mobile phase B). |
220 nm |
10.0 to 60.0 μg/mL and 6.25 μg/mL |
10.70 ±0.1 mins and 4.8 ± 0.1 mins |
1.5 |
UV |
46 |
9. |
AMI, ATN, CHL |
RP stainless steel C18 analytical column |
Methanol and 0.05 M aqueous phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 4 |
AMI 275 nm and 225 nm for ATE and CHL |
2–50, 25–150, and 2–100 μg/mL |
4.07, 7.22, 13.21 |
1 |
PDA |
47 |
10. |
IBS, LOS, HTZ, CHL |
Hypersil BDS |
0.05 M Sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile |
220 nm |
10–150 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
PDA |
48 |
11. |
HTZ, CHL |
LC-8-DB |
1.0 mM Ammonium acetate and 2.0 mM octane sulfonic acid sodium salt in acetonitrile: water (25:75) solution. The pH was adjusted to 3.5 with GAA |
254 nm |
--- |
--- |
1.5 |
--- |
49 |
12. |
AZL, CHL |
ODS |
0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid buffer: Acetonitrile (30:70) |
230 nm |
100 ppm-600ppm and 31.25ppm-187.5ppm |
4.5 ±0.3 min 2.2 ±0.3 min |
1 |
PDA |
50 |
13. |
IBS, CHL,CIL |
C18 column |
Buffer: Acetonitrile: TEA (80:20:0.1 %v/v/v) |
222 nm |
30-90 μg/mL, 1.25-3.75 μg/mL and 1-3 μg/mL |
3.807 min, 4.667 min, and 6.887 min |
1 |
UV |
51 |
14. |
CIL, ATN, CHL |
Hypersil- keystone C18 |
Methanol :Triple distilled water (80/20 v/v) having pH 7 |
225 nm |
10-50 μg/mL for , 10-50 μg/mL and 6- 36 μg/mL |
3.25 ± 0.06, 5.36 ±0.08 and 9.02 ±0.08 min |
1 |
UV |
52 |
15. |
CHL, AZL |
Zorbax XBD-C8 |
Buffer (pH5.5) : Methanol (60:40) |
234 nm |
50.56 - 151.68 ppm and 80.010 - 240.030 ppm |
6.030 and 10.997 min |
1 |
UV |
53 |
16. |
OLM, CHL |
Gemini C18 |
Water: Acetonitrile (55:45) with pH adjusted to 3 with OPA |
250 nm |
10-60 μg/mL and 5-30 μg/mL |
2.95 and 3.91 min |
1 |
UV
|
54 |
17. |
AZL, CHL |
BDS C18 column |
Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10). Phosphate buffer pH has been adjusted with orthophosphoric acid |
260nm |
10.0 to 60.0 μg/mL and 6.25 to 37.5 μg/mL |
2.36±0.1 mins and 5.54±0.5 mins |
0.9 |
PDA |
55 |
18. |
TEL, CIL, CHL |
BDS hypersil C18 |
Methanol: Buffer (0.05M ammonium acetate) pH 5 with orthophosphoric acid (40 : 60) |
270nm |
20–60 μg/mL, 5–15 μg/mL and 6.25–18.75 μg/mL |
3.390 min, 11.477 min, and 4.167 min |
1 |
UV
|
56 |
19. |
MET, TEL, CHL |
Phenomenex C18 column |
Phosphate buffer (pH adjusted to 3): Acetonitrile |
310 nm |
--- |
4.5, 7.2 and 11.01 min |
1 |
UV |
57 |
20. |
OLM, CHL |
BDS C18 |
10 mM Orthophosphoric acid buffer: Acetonitrile (45:55v/v) |
212 nm |
20 - 120 μg/mL and 6.24- 31.25 μg/mL |
3.216 and 2.113 min |
1 |
PDA |
58 |
21. |
OLM, CHL |
Inertsil ODS C18 |
KH2PO4 Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (60: 40 v/v) |
275 nm |
--- |
13.9 ± 0.1 min. and 4.4 ± 0.5 min |
1 |
UV |
59 |
22. |
OLM, CHL |
HypersilC18 |
Phosphate buffer (KH2PO4) adjusted to pH 5.0 with dilute orthophosphoric acid and methanol in the ratio of 40: 60 % v/v |
240 nm |
60 - 180 μg/mL and 18.75-56.25 μg/mL |
2.240min and 3.042min |
1.2 |
PDA |
60 |
23. |
BEN, CHL |
Agilent C18 column |
60% NaH2PO4 buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.0): Methanol (40%) |
262 nm |
4-12 μg/mL and 12.5-37.50 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
--- |
61 |
24. |
CHL, CIL |
C18 column |
Phase A, (0.1% Formic acid in methanol: Acetonitrile (80: 20 v/v) Phase B, (10 mM Ammonium acetate) |
240 nm |
--- |
6.047±0.2 min and 12.642 ±0.2 min |
1 |
--- |
62 |
25. |
CHL, IBS |
Reverse phase column C18 |
0.02 M Ammonium phosphate buffer (pH 5.5): Acetonitrile: Methanol (40:40:20 v/v/v) |
220 nm |
40-60% μg/mL, 480 - 720 % μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
UV |
63 |
26. |
AZL, CHL |
Double end-capped C18 column |
10 mM Tris(hydroxymethyl)amino methane buffer (pH 7.7): Acetonitrile (60:40 v/v) |
--- |
--- |
2.6, 4.9 min |
1 |
--- |
64 |
27. |
TEL, CHL |
Agilent Extend C18 |
Disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH:6.5): Acetonitrile |
235 nm |
6-18 mcg/mL and 20-60 mcg/mL |
3.82 min and 14.23 min |
1 |
PDA |
65 |
28. |
EPM, CHL |
Phenomenox, Gemini C18 |
Water: Acetonitrile (55:45) with pH adjusted to 3.4 with ortho phosphoric acid |
250 nm |
10-400 μg/mL and 0.5-12.5 μg/mL |
2.14 and 3.80 min |
1 |
UV |
66 |
29. |
CHL, CIL |
Inertsil ODS 3V |
0.025 M Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer, pH 2.5 adjusted using dilute orthophosphoric acid (solvent A) and Acetonitrile (solvent B) |
240 nm |
200-600 μg/mL and 160-480 μg/mL |
3.872 min and 7.668 min |
1 |
PDA |
67 |
30. |
AZL, CHL |
Eclipse XDB-C18 |
Methanol and potassium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 8, 0.05 M) (40:60,v/v) |
210 nm |
5.0–50.0 μg/mL and 2.5– 25.0 μg/mL |
--- |
0.8 |
UV |
68 |
31. |
ATN, AMI, CHL |
RP 18 column |
Acetonitrile: 5mM Heptansulphonic acid sodium salt (20:80v/v, pH 4.4) |
274 nm |
40–160 μg/mL, 2-8 μg/mL and 10-40 μg/mL |
4.2 ± 0.03, 5.1 ± 0.04, 6.5 ± 0.02 min |
1 |
UV |
69 |
32. |
AZL, CHL |
Inertsil C8 column |
0.025 M Phosphate buffer pH 2.7: Acetonitrile (52.5: 47.5%) |
225 nm |
2.5 – 40 and 1.5 – 25 μg/mL |
0.11 and 0.29 min |
1.5 |
PDA |
70 |
33. |
CHL, LOS |
C18 |
Acetonitrile: Water (50: 50, v/v) |
220 nm |
10-30 μg/mL and 20-60 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
UV |
71 |
34. |
AMB, VAL, TEL, HTZ, CHL |
Cosmosil PAQ |
0.05 M Sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile |
220 nm |
2 –150 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
UV |
72 |
35. |
ENM, CHL |
Hypersil BDS C18 |
Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (65:25:10 v/v/v) |
210 nm |
5-15 μg/mL and 12.5-37.5 μg/mL |
7.749 and 4.247 min |
1 |
UV |
73 |
36. |
TEL, CHL |
CAPCELL C18 |
Potassium dihydrogen ortho-phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (35: 45: 20) (pH 3.5 adjusted with OPA) |
--- |
20–100μg/mL and 6.25–31.25 μg/mL |
3.640min. and 4.937min |
0.8 |
--- |
74 |
37. |
CHL, MPS |
C18 |
Buffer pH 4.5: Methanol : Acetonitrile (50:25:25) |
223 nm |
5-15 μg/mL and 20-60 μg/mL |
4.390 and 6.127 min |
1 |
UV |
75 |
38. |
BEN, CHL |
C18 Kromasil column |
Methanol: 0.1M Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate buffer (40:60 v/v) |
260 nm |
2 - 6 μg/mL and 6.25 - 18.75 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
PDA |
76 |
39. |
AZL, CHL |
C 18G column |
Acetonitrile: 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid in water (40:60%v/v) |
240 nm |
5-80 μg/mL and 2.5-25 μg/mL |
6.982 and 7.748 min |
0.8 |
UV |
77 |
40. |
AZL, CHL |
C18 column |
Methanol: Water: Acetonitrile : 0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid (30:35:15:5 v/v/v/v) |
251 nm |
--- |
3.923min and 7.208 min |
0.9 |
UV |
78 |
41. |
CIL, CHL |
--- |
Methanol: Water (80: 20 v/v) |
231.6 nm |
10–70 μg/mL and 10–70 μg/mL |
--- |
1 |
UV |
79 |
42. |
AZL, CHL |
UPLC BEH C18 |
0.02% Trifluoroacetic acid in water: Acetonitrile |
225 nm |
40 and 12.5 μg/mL |
--- |
0.3 |
--- |
80 |
43. |
BEN, TEL, CHL |
C18 |
Buffer (pH 3.0): Methanol (50:50 v/v) |
230 nm |
2-6 μg/mL, 20-60 μg/mL and 6.25-18.75 μg/mL |
6.690 min, 8.813 min and 4.887 min |
1 |
PDA |
81 |
44. |
CHL, ATN |
C18 |
0.1M KH2PO4: Methanol (65:35) |
256nm |
50 μg/mL to150 μg/mL and 50 μg/mL to150 μg/mL |
3.346 and 3.931 min |
1 |
PDA |
82 |
45. |
MPS, CHL |
Inertsil ODS column |
10mM Ammonium Acetate: Acetonitrile (70:30% v/v) |
220nm |
5-25 μg/mL and 2-6 μg/mL |
5.6 and 7.5 min |
1 |
PDA |
83 |
46. |
ATN and CHL |
C18 |
Methanol:0.01 M Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (30:70 v/v pH 3.5) |
214nm |
10-1000 μg/mL and 0.05-20 μg/mL |
--- |
--- |
UV |
84 |
47. |
CHL and CLH |
Zorbax ODS Column |
1. 50% Methanol + 50% Water filtered through 1μm porosity membrane 2. 65% Methanol + 35% pH 7.9 Buffer solution (0.0022 M KH2P04 and 0.016 M Na2HPO4) |
254 nm |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
85 |
48. |
MPS and CHL |
Inertsil ODS 3 column |
Diammonium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 5.5): Methanol (70:30 v/v) |
254 nm |
50-300 μg/mL and 12.5-75 μg/mL |
6.91 min and 9.94 min |
1 |
--- |
86 |
HPTLC method for CHL:
Thin-layer chromatography is a popular technique for the analysis of a wide variety of organic and inorganic materials, because of its distinctive advantages such as minimal sample clean-up, a wide choice of mobile phases, flexibility in sample distinction, high sample loading capacity, and low cost. Four simple HPTLC methods have been studied for simultaneous estimation for CIL, TEL, AMI, and ATN. The summary of the reported HPTLC methods is shown in Table 4.
Ultra-Performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method for CHL
The summary of the reported all instrumental data of UPLC methods for the determination of CHL is summarized in Table 5.
Table 4: HPTLC methods for determination of CHL
Sr. No |
Name of drug |
Formulation |
Stationary phase plates |
Mobile phase composition |
Detection (nm) |
Linearity |
Rf |
Ref |
||||
NP |
RP |
NP |
RP |
NP |
RP |
NP |
RP |
|||||
1 |
CHL, CIL |
Bulk and tablet |
Precoated silica gel F254 |
RP-18 Silica gel F254 S |
Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Methanol (3.2:1.3:0.5 v/v/v) |
Methanol: Water (3.2:1.8 v/v |
275 nm |
CHL:250-1500 ng/b, CIL:200-1200 ng/b
|
CHL:250-1500 ng/b CIL: 200-1200 ng/b |
CHL:0.34 ± 0.02, CIL: 0.79 ± 0.02 |
CHL:0.24 ± 0.02, CIL: 0.81 ± 0.02 |
87 |
2 |
TEL, CHL |
Bulk and Tablet |
Pre coated with silica gel 60F254 |
--- |
Toluene: 2-Propanol: 25% Ammonia (6.5:3.5:0.2 v/v/v) |
--- |
257 nm |
TEL:200 - 500 ng/spot and CHL-50-250 ng/spot |
--- |
TEL:0.09, CHL: 0.38
|
--- |
88 |
3 |
TEL, CHL |
Bulk and pharmaceutical dosage Form |
Precoated silica gel 60F254 |
--- |
Acetonitrile: Toluene: Glacial acetic acid (7.5: 2.5: 0.05 v/v/v) |
--- |
242 nm |
--- |
--- |
TEL:0.26±0.02, CHL: 0.67±0.02 |
--- |
89 |
4 |
AMI, ATN, CHL |
Pharmaceutical dosage Form |
Silica gel 60F254 |
--- |
Chloroform– Methanol–Ammonia 27%, w/w (9 + 2 + 0.3 v/v/v) |
--- |
274 nm |
AMI: 0.1–0.5, ATN: 0.8–5.0, CHL: 0.3–1.5 μg/b |
--- |
--- |
--- |
90 |
NP: Normal phase; RP: Reverse phase
Table 5: Reported analytical UPLC method for determination of CHL
Sr. No |
Drug |
Stationary phase |
Mobile phase |
Flow Rate (mL/min) |
Detection wavelength |
Ref. |
1. |
CHL |
KR100-5CHI-TBB column (150 mm × 4.6 mm,5μm) |
n-Hexane: 2-Proponol: Acetic acid: Triethylamine (92:8:0.3:0.01 v/v) |
1.2 |
260 nm |
91 |
2. |
LOS, CHL |
HSS C18 100 mm x 2.1x 1.8 μm column |
560 mL of solution A (1.36 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer, pH 3.0) and 440 mL of solution B (Acetonitrile: Methanol 9:1) |
0.4 |
230 nm |
92 |
3. |
CDC, CHL |
Dionex C18 column 50 × 2.1 mm, 2.2 µm particle size |
5 mM, 6.2 ± 0.5 pH ammonium acetate buffer – acetonitrile |
0.5 |
215 nm |
93 |
4. |
AZL, CHL |
UPLC BEH C8 50 × 2.1mm i.d. |
Phosphate buffer solution:- Acetonitrile (50 : 50) |
0.31 |
254 nm |
94 |
CONCLUSION:
The present review article provides comprehensive data of various analytical and bioanalytical methods developed for CHL alone and in combinations. For analysis purpose, different analytical methods have been reported that includes HPLC, HPTLC, UPLC, UV spectroscopy, etc. The method along with their details concerning the mobile phase, stationary phase, retention time, etc., have been summarized in tabular form that will be more helpful for the researchers for further analytical method development for estimation of CHL in dosage form and pure form. In the future, enlisted data can be used for the development of analytical methods bio-analysis of CHL in pharmaceutical and biological formulations. Finally, it presents an opportunity for greater information on what has already been done and what new methods and changes can be developed to get a better estimation of CHL.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
Authors are thankful to TSPM’s, Trimurti Institute of Pharmacy, Paldhi (Bk) – 425 103, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India for providing necessary library facilities.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare that no conflict of interest.
ABBREVIATIONS:
1. µg/mL - Micro Gram per Milliliter
2. HPLC - High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
3. HPTLC - High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography
4. LC-MS/MS - Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy-Mass Spectroscopy
5. UPLC – Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography
6. nm - Nano Meter
7. NP – Normal Phase
8. RP - Reverse Phase
9. UV/VIS - Ultra Violet/Visible Spectroscopy
10. PDA - Photo Diode Array
11. GAA – Glacial Acetic Acid
12. CHL - Chlorthalidone
13. ATN - Atenolol
14. CE - Celiprolol HCl
15. AZL - Azilsartan Medoxomil
16. CAN - Candesartan
17. CIL - Cilnidipine
18. LOS - Losartan Potassium
19. OLM - Olmesartan Medoxomil
20. NVH - Nebivolol Hydrochloride
21. MET - Metoprolol Tartrate
22. TEL - Telmisartan
23. AMI - Amiloride Hydrochloride
24. AML - Amlodipine
25. CDC - Candesartan Cilexetil
26. IBS - Irbesartan
27. HTZ - Hydrochlorothiazide
28. BEN - Benidipine
29. EPM - Eprosartan Mesylate
30. AMB - Amlodipine Besylate
31. VAL - Valsartan
32. ENM - Enalapril Maleate
33. MPS - Metoprolol Succinate
34. BEN - Benidipine Hydrochloride
35. CLH - Clonidine Hydrochloride
36. WHO - World Health Organization
REFERENCE:
1. Gandhi SV, Sanklecha AP. HPLC method development and validation for estimation of chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Drug Delivary and Therapeutics. 2019; 9(4): 53-56.
2. “Drug profile for Chlorthalidone”: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00310
3. Kerndt C, Patel J. Chlorthalidone. 2020; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553174/.
4. Prabanathan A. Research Work: Development and Validation of Analytical Methods for the Simultaneous Estimation of Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone. http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/id/eprint/2262.
5. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/.
6. Spooner N. Dried blood spot sampling for quantitative bioanalysis, time for a revolution. Bioanalysis. 2010; 2: 1781.
7. Dadgar D, Kelly MT. Determination of chlorthalidone in human plasma by reversed-phase micellar liquid chromatography. Analyst.1988; 113(8): 1223-1227.
8. Elgawish MS, Mostafa SM, Elshanawane AA. Simple and rapid HPLC method for simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in spiked human plasma. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2011; 19 (1): 43–49.
9. Belal F, El-Brashy AM, El-Enany N, Tolba MM. Simultaneous determination of celiprolol HCl and chlorthalidone in tablets and biological fluids using high-performance liquid chromatography. Acta Chromatographica. 2012; 24 (2): 185–206.
10. El Gindy A, Sallam S, Abdel Salam RA. HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in human breast milk. Journal of Separation Science. 2008; 31 (4): 677-682.
11. Giachetti C, Tenconi A, Canali S, Zanolo G. Simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography Application to pharmacokinetic studies in man. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1997; 698(1-2): 187-194.
12. Nalawade V, Joshi S. Development and validation of LC-MS / MS method for simultaneous determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone from the human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2019; 11 (7): 2533–2537.
13. Campíns-Falcó P, Herráez-Hernández R, Sevtllano-Cabeza A. Simple and sensitive reversed-phase liquid chromatographic assay for analysis of chlorthalidone in urine. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 1993; 16 (12): 2571-2581.
14. Herraez-Hernandez R, Campins-Falco P, Sevillano-Cabeza A. Application of column switching in high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of chlorthalidone enantiomers in untreated urine. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 1996; 19(3): 403-414.
15. Rosenberg MJ, Lam KK, Dorsey TE. Analysis of chlorthalidone in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1986; 375; 438–443.
16. Guelen PJM, Baars AM, Vree TB, Nijkerk AJ, Vermeer JM. Rapid and sensitive determination of chlorthalidone in blood, plasma and urine of man using high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications.1980; 181 (3-4): 497–503.
17. Khuroo A, Mishra S, Singh O, Saxena S, Monif T. Simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone by LC–MS–MS in human plasma. Chromatographia. 2008; 68(9): 721-729.
18. Ramakrishna R, kumar Puttrevu S, Bhateria M, Bala V, Sharma VL, Bhatta RS. Simultaneous determination of azilsartan and chlorthalidone in rat and human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2015; 990: 185-197.
19. Salado SC, Vera-Avila LE. On-line solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of chlorthalidone in urine. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 1997; 690 (1-2): 195-202.
20. Shah JV, Patel DP, Shah PA, Sanyal M, Shrivastav PS. Simultaneous quantification of atenolol and chlorthalidone in human plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry. Biomedical Chromatography, 2016; 30 (2): 208–216.
21. Patel B, Jangid AG, Suhagia BN, Desai N. The simultaneous UPLC – MS / MS determination of emerging drug combination; candesartan and chlorthalidone in human plasma and its application. Biomedical Chromatography. 2017; 31 (9): e3946.
22. Niraimathi V, Jerad SA, Kumar SI. UV Spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of chlorthalidone in bulk and oral dosage form. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 3 (9): 7160-7167.
23. Ingle SU, Patil PA, Kulkarni V, Patil SV, Salunke PA, Wagh RS. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014; 3(9): 958-63.
24. Patel SN, Hinge MA, Bhanushali VM. Development and validation of a UV spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 9 (1): 41-45.
25. Bhanushali VM, Hinge MA, Patel SN. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of Chlorthalidone and Losartan potassium. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2015; 9: 54-59.
26. Kalyankar GG, Patel J, Bodiwala KB, Lodha SR, Mistry V. Development and validation of first order UV derivative spectroscopy method for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone in their combined tablet dosage form. An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 10(2): 101-111.
27. Sheth A, Shah N. Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in their combined dosage forms. Pharma Science Monitor. 2016; 7 (3).
28. Sawale V, Dhabarde DM, Mahapatra DK. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in bulk and tablet. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2017; 12(1): 55-66.
29. AH S, Patel CN, Shah NJ. Article Details UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Chlorthalidone and Nebivolol hydrochloride in their combined dosage forms. Indian Drug. 2016; 53(11): 38-45.
30. Pimple HC, Rane SS, Patil HD, Chaudhari RY, Patil VR. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of atenolol and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Pharmaceutical and BioSciences. Jan-Mar, 2017; 5 (1): 6-9.
31. Raval HV, Patel DM, Patel CN. Estimation of metoprolol tartrate and chlorthalidone in combined dosage form by UV-spectrophotometric methods. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2011; 4(7): 1132-1134.
32. Barot D, Pradhan PK, Patel G, Shah S, Parmar HP, Dey S, Upadhyay UM. Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric estimation of olmesartane medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. The Pharma Innovation, 2014; 3 (10, Part B): 76.
33. Chaudhary BR, Dave JB. Spectrophotometric method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in dosage form by second derivative method. Pharma Science Monitor. 2019; 10(3).
34. Padmane SP, Jain ND, Ittadwar AM, Walde SP. A Derivative UV spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in combined dose tablet formulation. International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014; 4 (1): 33-41.
35. Ebeid WM, Elkady EF, El-Zaher AA, El-Bagary RI, Patonay G. Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric studies on azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone to be utilized in their determination in pharmaceuticals. An Analytical Chemistry Insights. 2014; 9: 33-40.
36. Patel S, Patel D. Simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone by UV spectrophotometric method. Pharmagene. 2013; 1(3): 39-43.
37. Akiful HM, Nivedita G, Prashanth KK, Pradeep K T, Hasan AS, Prakash VD. Simultaneous estimation of atenolol and chlorthalidone as bulk and in tablet dosage form using UV-spectrophotometry. Journal of pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2012; 1(4): 20-23.
38. Siddiqui MR, AlOthman ZA, Rahman N. Analytical techniques in pharmaceutical analysis: A review. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2017; 10: S1409-S1421.
39. Singh B, Patel DK, Ghosh SK. A reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical formulation. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2009; 1(2): 24-9.
40. O'Hare MJ, Tan E, Moody JE. Quantitative determination of chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1979; 68 (1): 106-108.
41. Gandhi SV, Sanklecha AP. HPLC method development and validation for estimation of chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 2019; 9 (4): 53-56.
42. Sonawane S, Jadhav S, Rahade P, Chhajed S, Kshirsagar S. Development and validation of stability-indicating method for estimation of chlorthalidone in bulk and tablets with the use of experimental design in forced degradation experiments. Scientifica. Volume 2016, Article ID 4286482, 9 pages.
43. Muthyala NI, Naresh B. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation for the quantitative estimation chlorthalidone in API and tablet dosage form. International journal of advanced research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 4(10): 32-41.
44. Akshitha MFA. Method validation and development of chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC. International Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Science. Dec.2012; Volume 4, Issue 12: 9-16.
45. Bauer J, Quick J, Krogh S, Shada D. Stability indicating assay for chlorthalidone formulation: Evaluation of the USP analysis and a high performance liquid chromatographic analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1983; 72 (8): 924-928.
46. Manikandan S, Thirunarayanan G. Development and validation of reversed phase gradient HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in dosage forms. World Scientific News. 2015; (9): 132-154.
47. Youssef RM, Maher HM, El-Kimary EI, Hassan EM, Barary MH. Validated stability-indicating methods for the simultaneous determination of amiloride hydrochloride, atenolol, and chlorthalidone using HPTLC and HPLC with photodiode array detector. Journal of AOAC International. 2013; 96 (2): 313-323.
48. Mhaske RA, Sahasrabudhe S, Mhaske AA. RP-HPLC method for simultataneous determination of irbesartan, losartan, hydrohlorothiazide and chlorthalidone-application to commercially available drug products. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2012; 3 (4): 1116.
49. Sa'Sa' SI, Jalal IM, Khalil HS. Determination of atenolol combinations with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone in tablet formulations by reverse-phase HPLC. Journal of Liquid Chromatography. 1988; 11 (8): 1673-1696.
50. Sravani P, Rubesh Kumar S, Duganath N, Devanna N. Method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan and chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 4(5): 725, 729.
51. Dagariya RK, Jat RK. Method development and validation of Irbesartan chlorthalidone and Cilnidipine in their combined tablet dosage form by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2017; 7 (4): 88-96.
52. Solanki VS, Bishnoi RS, Baghel R, Jain D. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine, atenolol and chlorthalidone. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2018; 8 (6-s): 78-82.
53. Dighe NS, Thorat SK, Shinde GS, Dhamak KV. Quantitative estimation and validation of chlorthlidone and azilsartan medoximil in bulk and tablet dosage form by using RP-HPLC. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2019; 9 (4-s): 264-268.
54. Sawale V, Dangre P, Dhabarde D. I. S. H. A. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simulteneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 7(5): 266-269.
55. Naazneen S, Sridevi A. Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in solid dosage forms. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 6(6): 236-43.
56. Sharma A, Mishra A, Sharma S. Stability indicating simultaneous validation of telmisartan, cilnidipine and chlorthalidone with forced degradation behavior study by RP-HPLC in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 7: 6-12.
57. Shahana VP, Ramya GM, Rajesh A, Kathirvel S. A comprehensive validation method and development of RP-HPLC for simultaneous estimation of metoprolol, telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and its formulation. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2018; 11(6): 827-834.
58. Sreelatha P, Reddy DV, Palavai SR, Devi BR. Novel and validated stability-indicating HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of olmisartan and chlorthalidone in oral solid form. American Journal of Pharmatech Research. 2016; 6(3): 333-344.
59. Sherje A, Sonalkar A. Article Details Forced Degradation Studies of Olmesartan medoxomil and Chlorthalidone: Development and Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC method. Indian Drugs. 2019; 56(3): 39-45.
60. Yunoos M, Sankar DG. Optimization and validation of RP-HPLC stability indicating method for simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in pure drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 7(3): 2440-2448.
61. Devaka N. V. S. K, Rao VM. Determination of benidipine and chlorthalidone content in tablets using stability-indicating reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography technique. Drug Invention Today. 2020; 13(2).
62. Sawaikar L, Kapupara P. Development and Validation of a Stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in combined pharmaceutical dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(5): 2376-2380.
63. Kalaiselvi P, Lalitha KG. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and irbesarton in pharmaceutical dosage form. Pharmacophore. 2014; 5 (2): 279-286.
64. Kayesh R, Jahan MS, Sultan MZ. Development using response surface methodology and validation of a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in solid dosage form. Chromatographia. 2017; 80 (4): 593-603.
65. Chaudhary BR, Dave JB. Development and validation of stability indicating gradient RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk API and fixed dose combination. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2017; 6(10): 1015-1029.
66. Dangre P, Sawale V, Meshram S, Gunde M. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of eprosartan mesylate and chlorthalidone in tablet dosage form. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2015; 8 (2): 163-168.
67. Kudumula N, Prasad YR. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in bulk and combined tablet dosage form. Pharmacophore. 2014; 5 (4): 442-450.
68. Ebeid WM, Elkady EF, El-Zaher AA, El-Bagary RI, Patonay G. Stability-indicating RP-LC method for determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms: application to degradation kinetics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014; 406 (26): 6701-6712.
69. El-Gindy A, Emara S, Mostafa A. HPLC and chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of atenolol, amiloride hydrochloride and chlorthalidone. Il Farmaco. 2005; 60 (3): 269-278.
70. Gad MA, Amer SM, Zaazaa HE, Hassan SA. Strategies for stabilizing formulation and QbD assisted development of robust stability indicating method of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2020; 178: 112910.
71. Hinge MA, Bhanusali VM, Mahida RJ. Spectrophotometric and high performance liquid chromatographic determination of chlorthalidone and losartan potassium in combined dosage form. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2016; 6 (4): 408-420.
72. Mhaske RA, Garole DJ, Mhaske AA, Sahasrabudhe S. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of amlodipine besylate, valsartan, telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone: application to commercially available drug products. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2012; 3 (1): 141.
73. Dave VM, Maheshwari DG. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of enalapril maleate and chlorthalidone in synthetic mixture. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2015; 6 (4): 666-673.
74. Vanaja N, Preethi C, Manjunath SY, Pal K. Method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone by RP-HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2015; 5 (4): 171-177.
75. Kashyap R. K. R, Srinivasa U. S. U. Development and validation of HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and metoprolol succinate in bulk and dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Analysis. 2013; 1(2): 1-14.
76. Jagadeesh K, Annapurna N. Stability indicating method to analyze benidipine and chlorthalidone using HPLC technique: Establishment, validation and application to tablets. Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020; 26(1): 75-81.
77. Kumar TH, Begum A, Sankar DG. Determination of azilsartan medoximil and chlorthalidone in tablets exposed to forced degradation by using RP-HPLC. Biomedical Research. 2019; 30 (5). 10.35841/biomedicalresearch.30-19-331.
78. Kasimala MB, Kasimala BB. Reverse phase-HPLC method development and validation for the Simultaneous estimation of azilsartan medoxomil and Chlortalidone in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Atoms and Molecules. 2012; 2(1): 117.
79. Pawar VT, Pawar SV, More HN, Kulkarni AS, Gaikwad DT. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of cilnidipine and chlorthalidone. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10 (11): 3990-3996.
80. Samanthula G, Swain D, Sahu G, Bhagat S, Bharatam PV. Ultra HPLC method for fixed dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: identification and in silico toxicity prediction of degradation products. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2018; 73 (6): 560-569.
81. Patel B, Chaudhary A, Gami S. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of benidipine hydrochloride, telmisartan and chlorthalidone in Tablet. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3: 110-124.
82. Nagaraju K. Analytical method development and validation for the estimation of chlorthalidone and atenolol by RP-HPLC. International Journal for Advance Research and Development. 2018; 3(10): 133-138.
83. Jyothi AN, Ali SS, Nalluri BN, Unnisa A. Novel RP-HPLC-PDA method for the simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 2014; 3(12): 941-950.
84. Kang HA, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yoon H, Cho HY, Oh SY, Lee YB. Validated HPLC method for the pharmacokinetic study of atenolol and chlorthalidone combination therapy in korean subjects. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2006; 36(5): 331-338.
85. Walters SM, Stonys DB. Determination of chlorthalidone and clonidine hydrochloride in tablets by HPLC. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 1983; 21 (1): 43-45.
86. Sheth A, Patel CN, Ramlingam B, Shah N. Simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical solid dosage form by using a developed and validated reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic technique. Scholars Research Journal. 2012; 2(1):17.
87. Rathod RH, Patil AS, Shirkhedkar AA. Novel NP and RP-HPTLC in praxis for simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2018; 8 (6): 862-871.
88. Joglekar AP. Method development and validation for the estimation of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form by HPTLC Method. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8 (4): 376-381.
89. Parmar KE, Mehta RS, Patel ND, Parmar KE. Development and validation of HPTLC method for simultaneous determination of telmisartan and chlorthalidone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 5 (2): 420-425.
90. Youssef RM, Maher HM, El-Kimary EI, Hassan EM, Barary MH. Validated stability-indicating methods for the simultaneous determination of amiloride hydrochloride, atenolol, and chlorthalidone using HPTLC and HPLC with photodiode array detector. Journal of AOAC International. 2013; 96 (2): 313-323.
91. Tadiboyina S, Bannimath G, Inturi BK. Enantiomeric separation and quantitative estimation of chlorthalidone enantiomers by chiral ultra-fast liquid chromatography. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry. 2015; 5: 361-367.
92. Sirisha T, Gurupadayya B, Siddiraju S. Optimized and Validated RP-UPLC Method for the Determination of Losartan Potassium and Chlorthalidone in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2015; 5 (1): 133-136.
93. Singhal M, Amin S, Kukrety A, Chauhan A, Tiwari VK, Singh RM, Singh GN. Development and validation of RP-UPLC method using experimental design approach for simultaneous. Indian Drugs. 2014; 51(11): 33-46.
94. Hussein LA, Magdy NN, Ibrahim MA. Stability-indicating RP-UPLC method for simultaneous determination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in tablets in the presence of its degradation products. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2019; 57(3): 213-219.
Received on 09.07.2021 Modified on 22.11.2021
Accepted on 28.12.2021 ©AandV Publications All Right Reserved
Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2022; 14(1):63-71.
DOI: 10.52711/0975-4377.2022.00011